no live blogging

On Friday I attended the Victoria University Post election conference held in Parliament’s Legislative Council Chamber.  It is about my third one I think and they are always fascinating.  A mix of media, campaign managers and academics disect the campaign.

It is held under Chatham House Rule so you can use the information just not identify who said what, nor the identity of their organisations.  After morning tea, the request was also made for no live blogging – to be honest the person doing the asking appeared as though they weren’t sure what they were asking.  Besides they were already too late. Some blog posts had already been written and released to the wild, just not by me.

So over the next few days I will sift through my copious notes and prepare an entry on how each party’s campaign went.  Lots of people talked about multiple parties and there were plenty of questions and comments from the audience so you can’t make assumptions about who said what.

who really loves me?

During the election campaign some parties tried harder for my vote than others. So who tried the hardest? I kept a tally of the ways and numbers of times parties put themselves under my nose.

(In alphabetical order)

ACT
4 leaflets in my mailbox. One included a magnet. 3 of the leaflets were “homemade” pinted on a colour copier by the looks. Only one, the last one to arrive, was commerically and professionally printed.  This was also the only ACT leaflet of substance.

One street corner placard waving episode outside the window at work.  Didn’t make much impact as almost no-one tooted.

Greens
5 leaflets in my mailbox. All very professionally done. Good mix of headlines and detailed content. One duplicate leaflet delivered twice.

Three billboards on a trolley bus drove past the window at work. It was probably the same bus but I noticed it three times – very appropriate advertising I thought.

Labour
6 leaflets – the most of any party but with one duplicate.  Ran the full range from the PM writing to me adressing me by my first name, to the electorate candidate writing to me as a woman and addressing me as “Ms”. Also had the biggest glossiest leaflet and the smallest tackiest produced note inviting me to talk to him on a street corner. I was at work at the time.

One vehicle convoy which at one point was chased by a National convoy – very strange.

Last but not least one “Destiny church-esque” walk-by chanting march outside my window at work.  Thought it was a mistake as they looked and sounded more threatening than enthusiastic.

Maori Party
One vehicle convoy past the window at work. Complete with dozens of flags on dozens of vehicles and Hone Harawira on the back of a Ute with a megaphone.  Not entirely sure that was safe

National
Only 3 leaflets, 2 postcards of little substance and one 4 pager filled with pictures – Do you think I can’t read or do you have nothing to say? One leaflet invited me to morning tea with the candidate at a coffee shop – some of us work you know! I found it quite hard to disassociate the National candidate from his previous party so I almost assigned all the National leaflets to ACT.

One vehicle convoy spotted three times in an afternoon driving up and down Lambton Quay. At one point they appeared to do a U-turn to chase a Labour convoy.

One billboard on my route to work. I live very central so I didn’t regularly pass any of the suburban billboard farms. I did go and visit a couple but they don’t count.

Three street corner waving episodes – boy were these irritating. Did it occur to any of you that those buildings contain people trying to work. Besides it was quite irresponsible out on the traffic islands – enough people get hit by busses as it is, you’re just bloody lucky you didn’t become a statistic.

Did it have any impact?
No, I didn’t change the way I voted. It made me wonder what the point was in killing all those trees and wasting all that petrol on the convoys.  And what were the Progressives, United Future and NZ First doing? I heard and saw nothing of them.

The whole campaign felt quite superficial, pretty window dressings but not much behind it for some parties. When I went looking at candidate information across the country I thought it was woeful. A few had informative sites or pages but many more still got to polling day with “coming soon” notices on their pages. If your party is providing a page for you, how hard is it to write something meaningful and put up a digital photo?

history in the making

Asides from the hideous over-used phrase, the One News You Tube Election Debate is an excellent idea. I have no idea why Mark Sainsbury would think this is such a novel way to do things, after all, another election happening somewhere else in the world which is making a much bigger use of user generated content.

In previous elections we’ve had citizen questions filmed on the street by professional teams and nicely edited.  I like the idea of being able to vote on which questions get asked.  One News do say they aren’t making all questions available to vote on so I’m guessing what gets up on the site is moderated.  There are no ranting hateful questions at this point.  Mind you, having your face behind the question must make people think twice about being thoroughly obnoxious. You can’t hide behind an anonymous comment. I do wonder though what the demographic coverage will be like – will they all be younger and tech-savy?

And what amuses me most? Just how happy people are to display the contents of their bedrooms and living rooms.

election leaflets or caring for constituents?

The silly season has begun. Today in my mailbox I have three pieces of mail from politicians.

One is from Stephen Franks/National.  It has an authorisation statement on both sides and literally says “Vote Stephen Franks”.  No mistaking, it is an election leaflet.

Second item is from Heather Roy MP/Act.  She describes herself as ACT’s Wellington Central candidate and invites me to an informal evening with Roger Douglas.  Again this leaflet has the authorisations for both candidates.

The third item is a letter to the householder from Heather Roy. She writes to me as Act’s Wellington-based list member of Parliament.  Her letter carries both the Act logo and the House of Representatives logo. The main point of the letter is to mention her out of parliament office which she opened at the end of 2007. She also includes a magnet with her contact details on it.  The magnet also has both the Act and House of Reps logos.  This is very clever.  I don’t believe it is fooling anyone. You can’t tell me the timing of the third item isn’t all about the election.

slow news day

Honestly, I can’t believe the harpies and the media beat up over Phil Goff’s comments. Is that really the best they can do for news. Sometimes the media needs reminding they are there to report on the news not twist and distort it. Watch the clip and decide for yourself.